plusoptiX S09 - References

 

Experiences that a few users in Germany have shared regarding measurement accuracy, delegability and patient acceptance with our devices are listed below.

 

"The procedure is easy and always accepted very well."

Dres. Schmitt, Seipenbusch, Ramstein-Miesenbach

 

"Excellent method!"

Dr. Kuchenbauer, München

 

"After consultation with our ophthalmologist, we are very satisfied with the screening."

Dr. Perlia, Stuttgart

 

"Really very enriching diagnostic possibilities."

Dr. Geißendörfer, Selb

 

"The best medical innovation in a long time!"

Dr. Hüttner, Coburg

 

"We've had Lucy since July 2009 and are very satisfied. [...] We reloaded Clicks the first time. We were positively surprised that the loading procedure is so simple."

Dr. Aksungur, Fürth

 

"Ophthalmologists downplay this examination possibility and smile at and trivialize the examination's informative value. But then they supply glasses anyway.

Mature, stable and reliable working device. I should have gotten one sooner. Each year approx. 3-5 children who would have become amblyopic are detected.

It's a scandal that the examination isn't a public health insurance service. Would have to be introduced with blanket coverage like hearing screening. Meanwhile, I have more referable vision screening findings than referable TOAE. Early eye maintenance also counts for children."

Dr. Keller, Überlingen (07/2009)

 

"The parents are totally satisfied."

Dr. Rupieper, Gelsenkirchen

 

"An infant rarely has such a pronounced alternating, flickering fixation that a measurement won't succeed. The assistants get along well."

Dr. Wagner, Öhringen

 

"Acceptance of the examination in my practice is very good."

Dr. Krischke, Velpke

 

"We get along just fine with the plusoptiX S04. Parents who had it done were enthusiastic. The fantastic brochures will certainly contribute to making the test more familar and popular."

Dr. Hof, Engelskirchen

 

---